Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Add pylint for DB-GPT rag lib #1267

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 7, 2024
Merged

Conversation

fangyinc
Copy link
Collaborator

@fangyinc fangyinc commented Mar 7, 2024

Description

  • Add pylint for DB-GPT rag lib
  • Refactor the package import of the rag module

How Has This Been Tested?

make pre-commit

Snapshots:

Include snapshots for easier review.

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have already rebased the commits and make the commit message conform to the project standard.
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

@github-actions github-actions bot added the internal DB-GPT internal flag(chore|ci|refactor|test) label Mar 7, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@csunny csunny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

r+

Copy link
Collaborator

@Aries-ckt Aries-ckt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

r+

@Aries-ckt Aries-ckt merged commit 7446817 into eosphoros-ai:main Mar 7, 2024
5 checks passed
@fangyinc fangyinc deleted the rag-sdk branch March 7, 2024 17:17
Hopshine pushed a commit to Hopshine/DB-GPT that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
internal DB-GPT internal flag(chore|ci|refactor|test)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants